WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "89359085-c702-49d9-ae73-61956eb26e8a"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 6, "id": "26457", "owners": [6], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "26457"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagasaki-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00026457", "sets": ["1988"]}, "author_link": ["117660"], "item_3_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2021-03-23", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "216", "bibliographicPageStart": "203", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "7", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "多文化社会研究"}, {"bibliographic_title": "Journal of Global Humanities and Social Sciences, Nagasaki University", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_3_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "We now live in an era where various interconnected forms of technological and social risks help shape our lives. Risk can be understood as a challenge to human safety and security. Until recently, risk has been a keyword of safety sciences, which highlight safety and aim at designing more reliable and failure-proof technologies. Thus, risk has been treated as relatively simple, measurable, predictable and manageable phenomenon. Security studies have challenged this technological interpretation of risk, especially because security related hazards may lead to grave social consequences, such as outbreaks of conflicts and wars. Security risks are, therefore, more consequential to human survival, and they are more complex and reflexive than technological risks. This article traces the lineage of both disciplines and examines the concept of intentionality, which has been treated as the main dividing feature present in social but not in technical risks. For an illustration of intentionality, the article draws on an example of biological hazards arising from the deployment of chemical and biological weapons in the Iraq-Iran war. In the end, the article draws upon the complexities of the COVID-19 pandemic, and mentioning Ulrich Beck, it relativizes the concept of intentionality and concludes that even natural and technical risks are being impacted by human judgment, which is in itself rife with imperfections and unintended consequences.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_3_description_64": {"attribute_name": "引用", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "多文化社会研究, 7, pp.203-216; 2021", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_publisher_33": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "長崎大学多文化社会学部"}]}, "item_3_source_id_10": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA12713084", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_3_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "21891486", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_3_text_62": {"attribute_name": "sortkey", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "11"}]}, "item_3_text_63": {"attribute_name": "出版者別言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "School of Global Humanities and Social Sciences, Nagasaki University"}]}, "item_3_version_type_16": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Compel, Radomir"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "117660", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2021-04-07"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "JGHSS7_203.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "449.3 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 449300.0, "url": {"label": "JGHSS7_203.pdf", "url": "https://nagasaki-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/26457/files/JGHSS7_203.pdf"}, "version_id": "c0983255-f791-4c6f-afac-60f3bffc4c54"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Relationship between Safety and Security within the Context of Risk and Intentionality", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Relationship between Safety and Security within the Context of Risk and Intentionality"}]}, "item_type_id": "3", "owner": "6", "path": ["1988"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10069/00040652", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2021-04-07"}, "publish_date": "2021-04-07", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "26457", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Relationship between Safety and Security within the Context of Risk and Intentionality"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
Relationship between Safety and Security within the Context of Risk and Intentionality
http://hdl.handle.net/10069/00040652
http://hdl.handle.net/10069/0004065234a7ab24-ca97-46c7-bd0e-c57e1b76a54c
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
JGHSS7_203.pdf (449.3 kB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2021-04-07 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Relationship between Safety and Security within the Context of Risk and Intentionality | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
Compel, Radomir
× Compel, Radomir |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | We now live in an era where various interconnected forms of technological and social risks help shape our lives. Risk can be understood as a challenge to human safety and security. Until recently, risk has been a keyword of safety sciences, which highlight safety and aim at designing more reliable and failure-proof technologies. Thus, risk has been treated as relatively simple, measurable, predictable and manageable phenomenon. Security studies have challenged this technological interpretation of risk, especially because security related hazards may lead to grave social consequences, such as outbreaks of conflicts and wars. Security risks are, therefore, more consequential to human survival, and they are more complex and reflexive than technological risks. This article traces the lineage of both disciplines and examines the concept of intentionality, which has been treated as the main dividing feature present in social but not in technical risks. For an illustration of intentionality, the article draws on an example of biological hazards arising from the deployment of chemical and biological weapons in the Iraq-Iran war. In the end, the article draws upon the complexities of the COVID-19 pandemic, and mentioning Ulrich Beck, it relativizes the concept of intentionality and concludes that even natural and technical risks are being impacted by human judgment, which is in itself rife with imperfections and unintended consequences. | |||||
書誌情報 |
多文化社会研究 en : Journal of Global Humanities and Social Sciences, Nagasaki University 巻 7, p. 203-216, 発行日 2021-03-23 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 21891486 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA12713084 | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 長崎大学多文化社会学部 | |||||
出版者別言語 | ||||||
School of Global Humanities and Social Sciences, Nagasaki University | ||||||
sortkey | ||||||
11 | ||||||
引用 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 多文化社会研究, 7, pp.203-216; 2021 |