| アイテムタイプ |
学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) |
| 公開日 |
2025-11-27 |
| タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Bipolarization in the acceptance of reusing contaminated soil generated by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident of 2011 |
|
言語 |
en |
| 言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
| キーワード |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station |
| キーワード |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Contaminated soil |
| キーワード |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Radiation risk perception |
| 資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ識別子 |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
|
資源タイプ |
journal article |
| 著者 |
Watanabe, Tomoko
Matsunaga, Hitomi
Zabirowa, Aizhan
Terada, Stephen Takeshi
Kashiwazaki, Yuya
Orita, Makiko
Schneider, Thierry
Takamura, Noboru
|
| 抄録 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Abstract |
|
内容記述 |
The Japanese government has legislated the relocation of contaminated soil containing radioactive materials outside of Fukushima Prefecture by 2045 to accelerate Fukushima's recovery following the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (FDNPS). In this study, we investigated and analyzed factors associated with acceptance of the reuse of contaminated soil (RCS) among the Japanese public. We conducted an online questionnaire survey exactly ten years after the storage of radioactive contaminated soil began at interim storage facilities. We analyzed 5257 responses obtained from citizens aged 18 and over from all 48 prefectures of Japan. The study clarified that 46.7 % (2451) of participants accepted RCS, while 53.3 % (2806) did not, indicating that public opinion is polarized on this issue. The results revealed regional differences in opinions regarding RCS. Furthermore, the characteristics, knowledge of radiation, and interest in the FDNPS accident influenced opinions regarding RCS. In addition, people who were not accepting tended to be more concerned about the health effects of RCS, whereas those who were accepting were concerned about reputational damage. These results emphasizing the distinction among populations on their concerns are really interesting and can open a way forward for implementing RCS in a sustainable way. |
|
言語 |
en |
| 書誌情報 |
en : Progress in Disaster Science
巻 28,
p. art. no. 100479,
発行日 2025-11-14
|
| 出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
Elsevier Ltd |
|
言語 |
en |
| ISSN |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
ISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
25900617 |
| DOI |
|
|
関連タイプ |
isIdenticalTo |
|
|
識別子タイプ |
DOI |
|
|
関連識別子 |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100479 |
| 権利 |
|
|
権利情報 |
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
|
言語 |
en |
| 著者版フラグ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
VoR |
|
出版タイプResource |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| 引用 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
Progress in Disaster Science, 28, art. no. 100479; 2025 |
|
言語 |
en |
PDS28_100479.pdf (1.5 MB)
