@article{oai:nagasaki-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00028034,
 author = {寺田, 晋},
 journal = {多文化社会研究, Journal of Global Humanities and Social Sciences, Nagasaki University},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {This paper examines Miranda Fricker’s concept of epistemic injustice. It applies one type of epistemic injustice, which Fricker names “testimonial injustice,” for the analysis of discriminatory policing known as “stop-and-frisk” and asks if the concept can be a useful analytical tool for empirical case study. This paper argues that testimonial injustice as defined by Fricker needs to be extended so that it can take into account non-epistemic factors which are constitutive of the situation where testimonial injustice happens. Three factors this paper proposes to include into analysis in the case of stop-and-frisk are cognitive technology, pre-discursive bodily expression, and non-testimonial material evidence. This paper suggests that taking these factors into account is necessary for devising corrective measures for testimonial injustice which do not depend on the cultivation of the virtue of hearers., 多文化社会研究, 9, pp.46-66; 2023},
 pages = {49--66},
 title = {認識的不正義概念の可能性を検討する ――事例分析を通じた拡張の提案},
 volume = {9},
 year = {2023}
}