@article{oai:nagasaki-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003905,
 author = {林, 徹},
 issue = {4},
 journal = {経営と経済, Journal of Business and Economics},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {This paper clarifies three reasons why MONOPOLY（board game）has gateways for the history, principles, and policies of the banks and/or Central Banks. First, after reviewing the history of the actual banks briefly, we describe the emerging process of banks in the capitalistic economy by not historically but theoretically. Second, we compare the Bank/Banker in MONOPOLY with the financial capital（in theory）from some specific viewpoints, i.e., risk, risk-hedge, creditor, loan condition, loan customer, main business, etc. Then, we rethink the significance and role of the financial capital. Third, we try to explain the reason why the Bank/Banker in MONOPOLY can keep away from any conflict of interest among all
players（including the Banker him/herself）. Looking into the historical process of the juridical span in so-called “real subrogation,” we can find that the tone of the Judgments of the Supreme Court in Japan has changed thus far : from for actual financial institutions to against them. This is why they can never play part of the government or the court either, while the Bank/Banker in MOMOPOLY can and/or must do both., 経営と経済, 96(4), pp.1-22; 2017},
 pages = {1--22},
 title = {MONOPOLYRと銀行},
 volume = {96},
 year = {2017}
}