@article{oai:nagasaki-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00009005,
 author = {Ariyoshi, Tsuneo and Hashizume, Koji and Taniguchi, Shinichiro and Miura, Takashi and Tanigawa, Kazuyoshi and Matsukuma, Seiji and Odate, Tomohiro and Nakaji, Shun and Sumi, Mizuki and Eishi, Kiyoyuki},
 issue = {12},
 journal = {General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {Objective: Constrictive pericarditis is a disease characterized by marked thickening of the pericardium which causes restriction of diastolic cardiac function. The purpose of this report is to review the outcome of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis and to discuss its problems. Methods: Sixteen consecutive patients who underwent pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis in our institution between March 2000 and June 2011 were reviewed. All patients underwent decortication including at least the anterior surface from the right atrium to the left phrenic nerve and the diaphragmatic surface of the heart. The epicardium was concomitantly resectioned because it was usually sclerotic and constrictive. Results: Postoperatively, mean central venous pressure decreased to 8.8 ± 3.1 mmHg and was significantly lower than the preoperative value 15.3 ± 3.7 mmHg (p < 0.001). The mean postoperative duration of hospitalization was 25.6 ± 13.5 days. There were 2 in-hospital deaths and early mortality rate was 12.5 %; however, excluding hospital deaths, there were no significant postoperative complications and all survivors recovered and maintained good cardiac function during the mean follow-up period of 3.7 ± 2.8 years. Conclusion: For an acceptable outcome, surgical intervention should be performed at an appropriate time and the pericardiectomy should have proper scope and depth to prevent irreversible changes in the heart, liver, and other organs., General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 60(12), pp.796-802; 2012},
 pages = {796--802},
 title = {Surgical experience with chronic constrictive pericarditis},
 volume = {60},
 year = {2012}
}