WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "5a1e0a0d-aa2a-4e33-83d6-1da16461d970"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 2, "id": "10057", "owners": [2], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "10057"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagasaki-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00010057", "sets": ["762"]}, "author_link": ["40533", "40532"], "item_3_alternative_title_19": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "Two-sided dimensions of administrative bodies as an \"entity of administrative power\" and an \"entity of property rights\" in line with their possibility of to bring a civil suit: with reference to a judicial precedent to provide a clue for this issue in Japan"}]}, "item_3_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2011-09-26", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "1-2", "bibliographicPageEnd": "260", "bibliographicPageStart": "225", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "91", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "経営と経済"}, {"bibliographic_title": "Journal of Business and Economics", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_3_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper attempts to examine the interwoven relationship between\nthe entity of administrative power and the entity of property rights within\nadministrative bodies in Japan and to delimit the range of circumstances\nin which administrative bodies are allowed to bring to a civil suit\nif a person with some administrative obligations does not comply with\nthem and thereby violates the law. According to a judicial precedent adjudicated\nin July 2002,national or local governments are, in principle,\nnot allowed to bring a civil suit for the purpose of forcing such a person\nto implement administrative obligations exclusively as an entity of administrative\npower without any legal provisions to permit it, apart from\nthe case where they attempt to protect their own legal rights or benefits\nas an entity of property rights. While there are a number of measures\nassociated with payment obligations in which administrative compulsory\ncollection is allowed under law, this is not the case when it comes to\nsuch matters as the collection of the rent for public housing. Nevertheless,\nsome laws allow administrative bodies to rely on court enforcement\nin these cases, which appears, at first glance, contradictory to the idea\nof the aforementioned judicial precedent. This is mainly because these\nmeasures are fundamentally based on a contract for utilization of public\nfacilities, where both administrative bodies and the general public stand\nin an equivalent position to allow the bodies to be an entity of property\nrights. If these measures were implemented as an exercise of public\npower by administrative bodies, it would not be possible for the bodies\nto have recourse to court enforcement according to the idea shown in\nthe judicial precedent.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_3_description_5": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "田口信夫、高倉泰夫、森永春乃先生 定年退職記念号", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_64": {"attribute_name": "引用", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "經營と經濟, 91(1-2), pp.225-260; 2011", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "40533", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "Umino, Atsushi"}]}]}, "item_3_publisher_33": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "長崎大学経済学会"}]}, "item_3_relation_29": {"attribute_name": "論文ID(NAID)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_type": "isIdenticalTo", "subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "40019045087", "subitem_relation_type_select": "NAID"}}]}, "item_3_source_id_10": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN00069150", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_3_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "02869101", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_3_text_62": {"attribute_name": "sortkey", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "09"}]}, "item_3_text_63": {"attribute_name": "出版者別言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Economics Society of Nagasaki University"}]}, "item_3_version_type_16": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "海野, 敦史"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "40532", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-12-22"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "keizai91_1_225.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "663.2 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 663200.0, "url": {"label": "keizai91_1_225.pdf", "url": "https://nagasaki-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/10057/files/keizai91_1_225.pdf"}, "version_id": "f1aaa9e2-27ff-40f3-841b-53571840e5d3"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "entity of administrative power", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "entity of property rights", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "civil suit", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "public facilities", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "court enforcement", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "administrative law", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "「行政権の主体」と「財産権の主体」との交錯関係と司法的執行--宝塚市パチンコ店規制条例事件の判例を手がかりとして", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "「行政権の主体」と「財産権の主体」との交錯関係と司法的執行--宝塚市パチンコ店規制条例事件の判例を手がかりとして"}]}, "item_type_id": "3", "owner": "2", "path": ["762"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10069/28494", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2012-04-20"}, "publish_date": "2012-04-20", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "10057", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["「行政権の主体」と「財産権の主体」との交錯関係と司法的執行--宝塚市パチンコ店規制条例事件の判例を手がかりとして"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
「行政権の主体」と「財産権の主体」との交錯関係と司法的執行--宝塚市パチンコ店規制条例事件の判例を手がかりとして
http://hdl.handle.net/10069/28494
http://hdl.handle.net/10069/2849489bd61f4-d042-48b5-b9a9-5d9f9881ae89
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
keizai91_1_225.pdf (663.2 kB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2012-04-20 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 「行政権の主体」と「財産権の主体」との交錯関係と司法的執行--宝塚市パチンコ店規制条例事件の判例を手がかりとして | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | entity of administrative power | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | entity of property rights | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | civil suit | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | public facilities | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | court enforcement | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | administrative law | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
海野, 敦史
× 海野, 敦史 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
姓名 | Umino, Atsushi | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | Two-sided dimensions of administrative bodies as an "entity of administrative power" and an "entity of property rights" in line with their possibility of to bring a civil suit: with reference to a judicial precedent to provide a clue for this issue in Japan | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | This paper attempts to examine the interwoven relationship between the entity of administrative power and the entity of property rights within administrative bodies in Japan and to delimit the range of circumstances in which administrative bodies are allowed to bring to a civil suit if a person with some administrative obligations does not comply with them and thereby violates the law. According to a judicial precedent adjudicated in July 2002,national or local governments are, in principle, not allowed to bring a civil suit for the purpose of forcing such a person to implement administrative obligations exclusively as an entity of administrative power without any legal provisions to permit it, apart from the case where they attempt to protect their own legal rights or benefits as an entity of property rights. While there are a number of measures associated with payment obligations in which administrative compulsory collection is allowed under law, this is not the case when it comes to such matters as the collection of the rent for public housing. Nevertheless, some laws allow administrative bodies to rely on court enforcement in these cases, which appears, at first glance, contradictory to the idea of the aforementioned judicial precedent. This is mainly because these measures are fundamentally based on a contract for utilization of public facilities, where both administrative bodies and the general public stand in an equivalent position to allow the bodies to be an entity of property rights. If these measures were implemented as an exercise of public power by administrative bodies, it would not be possible for the bodies to have recourse to court enforcement according to the idea shown in the judicial precedent. |
|||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 田口信夫、高倉泰夫、森永春乃先生 定年退職記念号 | |||||
書誌情報 |
経営と経済 en : Journal of Business and Economics 巻 91, 号 1-2, p. 225-260, 発行日 2011-09-26 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 02869101 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN00069150 | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
論文ID(NAID) | ||||||
関連タイプ | isIdenticalTo | |||||
識別子タイプ | NAID | |||||
関連識別子 | 40019045087 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 長崎大学経済学会 | |||||
出版者別言語 | ||||||
Economics Society of Nagasaki University | ||||||
sortkey | ||||||
09 | ||||||
引用 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 經營と經濟, 91(1-2), pp.225-260; 2011 |