WEKO3
アイテム
Randomized phase II study of pemetrexed or pemetrexed plus bevacizumab for elderly patients with previously untreated non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: Results of the Lung Oncology Group in Kyushu (LOGIK1201)
http://hdl.handle.net/10069/39064
http://hdl.handle.net/10069/39064e12cb0d0-3174-4110-9f4a-7e8f4440d45a
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
LC132_1.pdf (555.7 kB)
|
|
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2020-07-01 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Randomized phase II study of pemetrexed or pemetrexed plus bevacizumab for elderly patients with previously untreated non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: Results of the Lung Oncology Group in Kyushu (LOGIK1201) | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | pemetrexed | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | bevacizumab | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | lung cancer | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | elderly | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | NSqNSCLC | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
著者 |
Fukuda, Minoru
× Fukuda, Minoru× Kitazaki, Takeshi× Ogawara, Daiki× Ichiki, Masao× Mukae, Hiroshi× Maruyama, Riichiroh× Nakagaki, Noriaki× Shimada, Midori× Ikeda, Takaya× Kishimoto, Junji× Harada, Taishi× Seto, Takashi× Ebi, Noriyuki× Takayama, Koichi× Okamoto, Isamu× Ichinose, Yukito× Sugio, Kenji |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety, we conducted a randomized phase II study of pemetrexed (Pem) versus Pem + bevacizumab (Bev) for elderly patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSqNSCLC). Patients and methods: The eligibility criteria were as follows: NSqNSCLC, no prior therapy,stage IIIB/IV disease or postoperative recurrence, age: ?75 years, performance status (PS): 0?1, and adequate bone marrow function. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio)to receive Pem or Pem + Bev. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).The secondary endpoints were the response rate, OS, toxicities, and cost-effectiveness. Results: Forty-one patients were enrolled and 40 (20 from each group) were assessable. Their characteristics were as follows: male/female = 23/17; median age (range) = 78 (75?83); stage IIIB/IV/postoperative recurrence = 1/30/9; PS 0/1 = 11/29. All cases involved adenocarcinoma.There was no significant intergroup difference in PFS and the median PFS (95% confidence interval) values of the Pem and Pem + Bev groups were 5.4 (3.0?7.4) and 5.5 (3.6?9.9) months, respectively (p = 0.66). The response rate was significantly higher in the Pem + Bev group(15% vs. 55%, p = 0.0146), and there was no significant difference in OS (median: 16.0 vs. 16.4 months, p = 0.58). Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia, neutropenia,and thrombocytopenia were seen in 10 and 30, 20 and 55, and 5 and 5 cases, respectively. Drug costs were higher in the Pem + Bev group (median: 1,522,008 vs. 3,368,428 JPY, p = 0.01). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Adding Bev to Pem did not result in improved survival in the elderly NSqNSCLC patients. Compared with Pem + Bev, Pem monotherapy had similar effects on survival, a more favorable toxicity profile, and was more cost-effective in elderly NSqNSCLC patients. Pem monotherapy might be one of the optional regimen for NSqNSCLC patients aged ?75 years. |
|||||
書誌情報 |
Lung Cancer 巻 132, p. 1-8, 発行日 2019-06 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | Elsevier B.V. | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 01695002 | |||||
DOI | ||||||
関連タイプ | isVersionOf | |||||
識別子タイプ | DOI | |||||
関連識別子 | 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.01.008 | |||||
権利 | ||||||
権利情報 | c 2019 Elsevier B.V. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | AM | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | |||||
引用 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Lung Cancer, 132, pp.1-8; 2019 |